Spine. 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1658-65
Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated
intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance
imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis.
Guehring T, Omlor GW, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K, Richter W, Carstens C,
Kroeber M. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
STUDY DESIGN: An animal model of degeneration was used to determine
the effects of disc distraction, and was evaluated with magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) as well as gene and protein expression levels.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate gene expression and MRI effects of distraction.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc degeneration can result from
hyper-physiologic loading. Distracted discs with degeneration showed histologic
signs of tissue recovery.
METHODS: There were 18 rabbits that underwent 28 days of compression
(200 N) to induce moderate disc degeneration followed by 28 days of distraction
(120 N; attached and loaded distraction device) or sham distraction (attached
but unloaded distraction device). Comparison was performed with 56 days of
compressed discs without distraction. Quantitative outcome measures were
MRI signal intensity and gene expression analysis to determine: messenger
ribonucleic acid levels for extracellular matrix genes, including collagen
1, collagen 2, biglycan, decorin, aggrecan, fibromodulin, and osteonectin;
and matrix-regulative genes, including matrix metalloproteinase-13,
tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and bone morphogenetic protein
(BMP)-2. Immunohistology was performed for collagen 2 and BMP-2 to label
cells semiquantitatively by staining of the cell-surrounding matrix.
RESULTS: A total of 28 days of compression decreased signal intensity.
Distraction over the same period reestablished physiologic signal intensity,
however, a persistent reduction was found in sham distraction. Distraction
resulted in gene expression up-regulation of collagen 1 (5.4-fold), collagen
2 (5.5-fold), biglycan (7.7-fold), and decorin (3.4-fold), while expression
of fibromodulin (0.16-fold), tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1
(0.05-fold), and BMP-2 (0.15-fold) was decreased, as compared with 56 days
compression. Distracted discs showed more BMP-2 (19.67 vs. 3.67 in 56 days
compression) and collagen 2 (18.67 vs. 11.33 in 56 days compression) positive
cells per field.
CONCLUSIONS: Distraction results in disc rehydration, stimulated
extracellular matrix gene expression, and increased numbers of protein-expressing
Back to Research Page
Click here to view case studies on actual patients
in our office.
RETURN TO SPINAL DECOMPRESSION FRONT PAGE
To Talk to a Doctor or
Schedule an Appointment, Call
AUSTIN CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC
2500 West William Cannon Drive,
Suite 205- Austin, TX 78745